THERAPEUTIC ABORTION is a kind of termination of pregnancy that has medical application. Although act to abort is considered forbidden in the most of the legal systems, but in some cases, exceptionally it is allowed one case in which the ABORTION is allowed is interference rule. According to this rule, due to abnormality of embryo and keeping mother's health, the ABORTION is possible before insufflations of spirit and based on single article of THERAPEUTIC ABORTION, but in accordance with the single article, after insufflations of spirit, ABORTION is impossible. Therefore, by virtue of note of Art. 718 of Islamic Penal Code approved in 2013, in order to keep mother's health, the ABORTION is allowed even after insufflations of spirit. The jurists prescribe ABORTION before insufflations of spirit for THERAPEUTIC cases. Some of jurists believe that even after insufflations of spirit in the embryo, if it would be proved that existing of embryo threaten mother's health, ABORTION of such embryo is allowed It looks that the jurists who don’t believe in ABORTION after insufflations of spirit, if state their reasoning based on interference rule- most important – important, then they change their idea. In the other word, intellectually we can diagnose that due to reduce more damage, the theory of ABORTION even after insufflations of spirit shall be empowered and identified and executed.

THERAPEUTIC ABORTION is referred to the end of pregnancy, before the fetus could maintain living outside the mother’s body in order to protect the mother's health, or due to disease or fetal deficiencies. The researches about the ABORTION show that there is a direct relation between the legality of the ABORTION and the low death rate of women caused by criminal miscarriages, but with the ratification of the THERAPEUTIC ABORTION Act and the issuance of permission in maternal and fetal diseases that would bother the mother, a basic development occurred in the area of THERAPEUTIC ABORTION.Notwithstanding, many cases of unwanted pregnancies have been ignored for various reasons in the current Act and this reveals the necessity for the examination of different dimensions of the issue.As there have been different practices in respect of THERAPEUTIC ABORTION in different countries, now it is the time that our legislature place many women victimized by the sexual crimes under its legal, hygienic and social protection.

Introduction and Objective: Hemolytic diseases in fetal and newborn were known for years the principle of these pathologies is defined. Basically, entrance of fetal blood cells to maternal circulation results in these ranges of diseases. Risk factor determination, early diagnosis of F.M.H and adequate dosage of Anti- D Ig administration will be attempted to prevent subsequent adverse outcome on fetus and newborn. The quantification of fetal cells in the maternal circulation post- curettage miscarriage remains an important goal to prevent active immunization in mother.Materials & Methods: In this cross sectional study, during six months, from April 2004, one hundred patients post- ABORTION THERAPEUTIC curettage enrolled, in Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University. Maternal age, gestational age, maternal blood group and Rh, gravidity, severity of maternal hemorrhage, HcT, BP and duration of vaginal bleeding were recorded. The KB test was done in all patients amount of F.M.H and Rh IgG dosage in positive KB patients were calculated. Data were analyzed with SPSS (Ver. 10) software.Results: The KB test was positive in 35% of the patient. Gestational age, maternal H.ct, pain and severity hemorrhage had significant relation to K.B test positive. F.M.H was 0.1-5 cc in 17 patients and in 18 was less.Conclusion: Lower gestational age in ABORTION time decreases FMH risk the usual Rh- IgG dosage (50 μgr) sounded to be adequate for Rh Immunization after post- ABORTION THERAPEUTIC curettage.

Siqt janin (ABORTION) is defined as the intentional or unintentional action that is performed on a pregnant woman, which compromises the life or the foetal development of an unborn baby, such that it dies or cannot continue living out of the uterus. Due to scientific and technological advancement in medicine, the controversy of THERAPEUTIC ABORTION is very much at the forefront of modern discussions. It is also a matter of dispute amongst Muslim jurists. Initial positions and rulings of jurists differ with regards to ABORTION in the first four months of pregnancy, which is prior to ensoulment (nafkh ruh). Although there is a difference in opinion among Sunni jurists regarding ABORTION before ensoulment, there is a consensus that under normal circumstances, after this critical juncture, it is forbidden. All Shi‘i jurists, however, deem ABORTION without due reason, as forbidden regardless of the stage in pregnancy. Even so, most jurists permit the ABORTION of the foetus prior to ensoulment with the condition that there is substantial danger to expectant mother‘s health. Moreover, if there is danger to the mother‘s life, then some consider ABORTION permissible even after ensoulment.

Legislator with the legislation of the single article of THERAPEUTIC ABORTION 1384 and also the article note718 to a large extent, can change the conflict of votes regarding the ABORTION license to the unity of the vote. However, the literature of these two articles and their correspondence with each other has led to an ambiguous reading for medical and judicial experts. To the point that the concept of the abrogation of the single article 84 is strengthened by Article 718. The first ambiguity is the mention of the words "threat" and "danger" in the legal materials. Article 84 states that if the mother is threatened with death, it is possible to abort the fetus by considering some conditions. The article note718 issues the same license with the phrase "a danger to mother’ s life". Why does the legislator have two different interpretations? Do any of the words "threat" and "danger" indicate a particular issue that the legislature has deliberately mentioned? The second ambiguity is about the possibility of developing the concept of a condition of threat or danger to life; Is the legislator's purpose of the condition of " threat or danger to life" exclusive to death or does it include the failure and loss of organs? This paper adopts descriptive-analytical method based on medical and jurisprudential data and concludes that there is a substantial difference between the words "threat" and "danger" in the legislative language. This difference prevents the abrogation of article note 84. It can also be concluded that in the case of the possibility of developing the concept of danger to life to the deterioration of organs and benefits, there should be a difference between before and after the soul is blown.

Background & Aim: Absence of laws regarding legal ABORTION in cases of fetal anomalies and diseases was a problem that was solved in 1997 with a fatwa issued by the grand leader of Islamic revolution in Iran that permitted THERAPEUTIC ABORTION in cases of major thalassemia. In 2002, Iranian legal medicine organization developed a set of regulations governing THERAPEUTIC ABORTION cases, and eventually it was approved by the parliament in 2005 and be lame a law.Materials & Methods: This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective one that was carried out by probing in previous records of these cases in legal medicine centers of Iran, the data were transferred to prepared forms and then analyzed by SPSS software.Results: The results show that form loll permitted issued cases with one year performance of THERAPEUTIC ABORTION, the causes of 64% of them were about fetuses with diseases and anomalies and 36% about maternal diseases. The most important fetal anomalies and diseases were anencephaly and major thalassemia, and the most important maternal diseases were cardiovascular diseases. The average of mother s age at time of issuance of permit was 29.4 years and that of the fetus was 12.8 weeks. Conclusion: A significant number of those who previously would have using illegal ways of ABORTION, now can resort to legal methods provided in these regulations, which has a positive impact on pregnant women s health. Since this set of regulations is based on Islamic principles and up-to-date medical findings it can serve as a model for other Islamic countries.